Where are the anti-gluten, anti-processed food champions when we need them?
The good thing about the book was the extensive bibliography. I researched, read and cited a few of the references in my dissertation. Still, the author's conclusions are flawed. For instance, she says cravings reflect the body's needs. It's a common theory, but it's just not the case with processed, addictive foods.
So I hope you haven't been recommending chocolate for your friends, even if it's PMS time!
Why talk about this not-so-new book? Because cocoa is news. No doubt you've read about, heard about, and talked about the benefits of cocoa, particularly dark, unsweetened, 70% cacao. They're everywhere lately: the antioxidant benefits due to the specific flavonoids in cocoa, called polyphenols.
A quick summary of the benefits includes decreases in all of these: blood pressure, insulin resistance, excess clotting, diabetes risk factors, and the risk of cancer, stroke, and coronary heart disease.
In addition, cocoa promotes increased HDL (good) cholesterol and improvements in vascular health and gut bacteria, which thrive on the polyphenols. Cocoa can also prevent oxidation of LDL, which contributes to arterial disease when unchecked. It even seems to inhibit fluid secretion in the small intestine, so research may soon show it to be effective in treating diarrhea.
Other health benefits are reduced fatigue and improved mood, both due to cocoa's natural theobromine (similar to caffeine). Another mood-elevating chemical in cocoa is phenylethylamine, sometimes likened to the feeling of being in love.
What I won't do - send me your hate mail now - is what the book's author did, namely recommend chocolate. Even 70% dark chocolate.
Why not? The drawbacks of sugar are too great. In fact, sugar can singlehandedly reverse almost every one of the benefits of cocoa listed above.
But there's not much sugar in 70% chocolate, you say.
Sugar addiction is my specialty, so I look at sugar's consequences differently. Recently, at someone else's seminar, a participant offered her opinion that "sugar is bad in large quantities." You'll never hear me argue with that! Yet sugar can be bad even in small quantities because of its sneaky effects.
One sneaky effect of sugar is to increase appetite. Another sneaky effect is to change food preferences. Both of these are due to endorphins, which are often overlooked when people talk about health or food.
And what then? You may eat an "innocent" amount of chocolate and find yourself wanting more food in general AND more endorphin-triggering foods - such as sugar of all types.
This is how the quantity of sugar can go way up when women eat chocolate for its "health" benefits. Health becomes the excuse for eating it. And that's why I won't recommend it (no matter who does).
But I will - and do - strongly recommend cocoa. Dark, unsweetened, 70% cacao will let you reap the benefits of cocoa without the drawbacks of sugar. Now that's something you can tell your friends.
Avoiding the sugar in chocolate is only one step in a healthy
life. I'm dedicated to helping you conquer food addictions so you can
transform your health completely and stay that way forever. I would love
to help you find easy ways to improve your health and your nutrition.
You can get the plan you need to change your health and your life, along
with easy-to-follow guides that show you exactly how I used this
information to eliminate serious health problems in thousands of clients
over the years. My next Last Resort Nutrition® program is only weeks
away. Please contact me directly at drjoan@foodaddictionsolutions.com. You can get more information at http://www.foodaddictionsolutions.com under Services>Workshops or visit http://www.lastresortnutrition.com.
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joan_Kent
No comments:
Post a Comment